Page 59 - FDMAsia SepOct 2025
P. 59

MATERIALS         57
         www.fdmasia.com | FDM ASIA SEP/OCT 2025




          flowing of the binder on the board surfaces (impact of higher   to other SA-bonded boards.
          amount of the binder) or even the explosion of the board   Both MOE and MOR (the difference is significant) values
          sample after the press opening (impact of higher temperature).   of WSSA samples are higher than those of WSSE samples,
            These negative experiments, in details not described here,   indicating a positive influence of the SA binder and its

          resulted in the selection of optimal pressing parameters for   compatibility with wheat straw particles.
          SA boards described in details above.                 The previous study on particleboards composed of birch
                                                             wood particles bonded by the SA binder reported MOE values
          Bending Properties Of The Investigated Particleboards  in the range of 1645–2772 N/mm2 and MOR of 8.7–18.7 N/
          The bending properties of the investigated particleboards are   mm2.
          summarised in this study. MOE  values of  the boards vary   This means that during this study the bending properties
          in the range of 3720–9980 N/mm2, while MOR values vary   of SA boards were significantly increased to a great extent
          within 18–66 N/mm2.                                due to the higher density (850–1000 kg/m3 vs. 1170–1245
            The minimum and maximum of both MOE and MOR      kg/m3, respectively).

          values achieved belong to the SE boards. Both MOE and   It is worth noting that the content of the SA binder was
          MOR values of the SE boards from wood (GA and SW) are   decreased to 16 percent during this study (vs. 20%–30%
          significantly higher than those obtained from wheat straw by   in the previous study) because of the higher density of the
          both pressing types.                               boards, which was not able to penetrate the higher content
            Due to the high standard deviation, there is no significant   of the SA binder.
          difference in MOE values between the WSSE samples, depending   According to EN 312 specifications for the particleboards for
          on  the  pressing  type.  However, WSSE  board  samples  hot-  use in a humid environment, the MOE and MOR values should

          pressed by the conventional type achieved significantly higher   achieve at least 2050 N/mm2 and 15 N/mm2, respectively.
          results  of  MOR  compared  to the samples  obtained  by  the   Our results show that the requirements for both bending
          mould pressing.                                    properties were achieved in all produced particleboards,
            The studies performed before on WSSE and GASE with   exceeding the values from 1.8× to 4.9× in the case of MOE
          different conditions by conventional hot-pressing reported values   and from 1.2× to 4.4× in the case of MOR.
          for MOE of 3400–4640 N/mm2 and 6260–7260 N/mm2, and   The most essential property of wood-based panels
          for MOR of 20–28 N/mm2 and 27–32 N/mm2, respectively.   characterising adhesion between the particles is internal
            This means that the bending properties of WSSE remain   bonding (IB). The IB values vary significantly from 0.44 N/
          at the same degree regardless of the manufacturing condition   mm2 to 3.04 N/mm2 depending on all the variables.

          differences; however, both MOE and MOR of GASE boards   The lowest IB values were achieved by the boards from WS
          were significantly increased during this study.
            As a result, the bending properties of GASE boards were
          improved by separation of the soluble fraction after the SE                                         sustainability-directory.com
          processing even with reduced pressing time.
            Between the samples bonded by SA binder, there is no
          significant difference in both MOE and MOR values regardless

          of the LCB species and pressing type used. Only the SWSA-M
          sample achieved a significantly lower MOR value compared
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64