Page 43 - FDMAsia Nov/Dec 2025
P. 43

MATERIALS         41
         www.fdmasia.com | FDM ASIA NOV/DEC 2025




            Current design standards, such as Eurocode 5, lack                                                freepik.com
          comprehensive fatigue-based design rules due to the absence
          of reliable analytical models. The next generation of standards
          aims to address this gap.

            Despite progress, wood fatigue remains a specialised
          field. Since fatigue accounts for up to 90 percent of material
          failures, a better understanding is crucial for optimising the
          use of wood as a renewable resource.
            This review synthesises existing literature on the cyclic fatigue
          of wood, covering influencing factors, materials, measurement
          methods, predictive models, and practical applications.  it chars on the surface while retaining a load-bearing core.
                                                             Research shows that elevated temperatures accelerate damage
          Influence Of Physical Properties                   formation under cyclic loading, reducing fatigue life.

          Firstly, density is a key physical indicator correlated with many   Thermal cycling causes expansion and contraction,
          mechanical properties. It is closely linked to moisture content   potentially leading to microcracks.
          and varies with growth conditions and within a single tree   For wood's orthotropic nature, it means its fatigue response
          (e.g., due to knots, earlywood/latewood).          is highly dependent on the load direction relative to the grain.
            Research generally indicates that higher density improves   In wood materials, different loading conditions result in
          fatigue resistance, as it is associated with better mechanical   distinct mechanical behaviours. Longitudinal tension exhibits
          properties under constant load tests. While some studies show   the highest fatigue strength, where failure is characterised by

          conflicting results, the consensus is that higher density wood   longitudinal crack growth and fibre pull - out.
          exhibits superior fatigue performance.                Perpendicular tension, on the other hand, shows the lowest
            Besides, moisture content significantly influences mechanical   static and fatigue strength because the cellular structure is
          properties. Up to the Fibre Saturation Point (FSP, typically   weak in this direction. Longitudinal compression has a lower
          25-30%), an increase in moisture reduces the modulus of   fatigue life than tension; damage begins with crushed cell
          elasticity, strength, and fatigue life. For instance, LVL samples   walls (kinks), eventually leading to a characteristic 45-degree
          at 35 percent moisture content showed significantly shorter   shear failure.
          fatigue life compared to those at five percent.       Flexural load is the most common test for wood, with
            Moisture interacts with temperature, and rapid moisture   failure involving tensile cracks on one side and crushing on

          changes can induce internal stresses, leading to damage   the other. When stress is normalised to static strength, fatigue
          accumulation. High-frequency fatigue testing can cause   life is largely independent of species.
          localised temperature increases, potentially leading to drying   Shear load has a shear strength lower than tensile or
          and further altering the material's response.      compressive strength, yet its normalised fatigue strength is
            In addition, temperature directly affects mechanical   comparable to other loading directions.
          properties; the modulus of elasticity and strength decrease   In torsion, fatigue behaviour differs between hardwoods
          as temperature rises. Indirectly, temperature influences relative   and softwoods, with hardwoods showing progressive damage

          humidity, which in turn affects moisture content.   while softwoods fail suddenly.
            Wood performs better than steel in fire scenarios because   The size of a structural element influences its load-bearing
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48