Page 37 - FDMAsia Jul/Aug 2026
P. 37

TECHNOLOGY           35
         www.fdmasia.com | FDM ASIA JUL/AUG 2026




          used to calculate the rotational stiffness of the joint.   were assigned the material properties of fully dense RePLA+.
            The maximum bending moment was expressed as the     The  sparse  cubic  infill  was  not  modelled  explicitly,  but
          product  of  the  maximum force  and  the joint  arm  length.   was replaced by a homogenised continuum with effective
          Rotational stiffness was calculated from the change in bending   properties dependent on the nominal infill density.
          moment divided by the change in joint rotation angle within   This modelling approach was adopted because the aim
          the linear region.                                 of the FEM analysis was not to reproduce the local behaviour

            To evaluate material efficiency, the specific maximum   of individual toolpaths, infill rib collapse, layer delamination,
          bending moment was calculated as the maximum bending   or filament-level damage.
          moment divided by the nominal filament mass estimated by   Instead, the model was intended for comparison of the
          the slicing software for each connector configuration.   global mechanical response, contact behaviour, and critical
            The specimens were loaded at a constant crosshead   stress regions of the connector configurations.
          displacement rate of 10 mm/min. The maximum load was   Replacing the sparse infill with a homogenised core reduced
          defined as the highest force recorded during the test, and   the computational cost and enabled comparison of variants
          the post-peak failure criterion was defined as a decrease in   with different infill densities  without explicitly  modelling  the
          force to 50 percent of the maximum load.           internal infill geometry.

            The experimental results were statistically analysed using a   The effective density of the homogenised sparse infill was
          two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to evaluate the influence   calculated as the product of the fully dense material density
          of infill density, perimeter count, and their interaction on the   and the nominal infill density.
          maximum bending moment, rotational stiffness, and specific   The effective Young's modulus of the homogenised sparse
          bending moment of the joints.                      infill was determined by simple scaling with relative density,
            Statistical significance was assessed at ễ = 0.05. Model   following the homogenisation concept used for FDM/FFF
          residuals were assessed for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk   parts with internal infill.

          test, and homogeneity of variances was evaluated using   The  interfaces  between  the  fully  printed  regions  of  the
          Levene's test.                                     FDM connector and the homogenised core were defined as
            A FEM model was developed in ANSYS Mechanical to   bonded contact, assuming perfect interaction between the
          complement the experimental results and explain the load-  connector domains without modelling delamination, toolpath
          transfer mechanism between the FDM-printed connector and
          the wooden members.
                                                                                                              pxhere.com
            The FEM analysis was not intended to provide a precise
          prediction  of  failure  initiation,  layer  delamination,  or  local
          damage within the printed material.

            Instead, it was used as a comparative and interpretative
          tool for evaluating contact behaviour, reaction forces, and the
          distribution of stresses in critical regions of the joint.
            In the FEM model, the FDM-printed connector was
          represented by a two-domain shell-core model. The fully
          printed regions, including the perimeter walls, top and bottom
          solid layers, bridges, and slicer-generated solid infill regions,
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42